Science vs. Pseudoscience: Is psychology a science? Part 1 - "personality disorders"

Posted 1/30/2015

The mainstream of psychology, especially that part of pos-Freud tradition, is pseudoscience for me, not only me. Unfortunately the psychologists lobby is responsible for some false accusations on the basis of their opinions as expert witnesses, in some cases they are responsible (again, on the basis of their opinions) for taking away parents' children. What is the basis for thos opinions? In most cases psychologica, pseudoscientific "tests" (I wrote earlier about e.g. Rorschach's "test" on this blog - I plan to return to this issue). It happens in XXI century...

There are exceptions, really wise and inteligent psychologists - it is that fraction, small part of scientific stream in psychology unlike

0 wyświetlenia0 komentarz

Ostatnie posty

Zobacz wszystkie

Artificial Intelligence: Deep Learning, Really?

ENG (Google Transl.) Reflection on the value of knowing the history of science, at least in one's own field, and redundant terminology. Perhaps these remarks would be appropriate for the group on term

Artificial Intelligence: AI and Art, part 1

ENG (Google Transl.): Does AI (s) create art, maybe better than man? Some publications convince us that artificial intelligence will be able to create, and even creates works of art. This belief does

Prof. Krzysztof Michalik

Artificial Intelligence & Professional Activity

This site was designed with the
website builder. Create your website today.
Start Now